Maltese Falcon
I think that The
Maltese Falcon was a pretty okay movie, though I personally was not really
curious about what was going to happen next, though the movie does attempt to
be suspenseful. At first, the introduction of the three separate characters who
met with Spade was a bit confusing because I did not know what relation they
had with each other, but it eventually came pretty clear, though I wish the
identity and importance of the Maltese Falcon was revealed earlier than half
way through the movie, though I guess that does keep the viewers engaged and
curious. I was quite surprised that Archer died so quickly, because it is
usually noted that in some detective stories, the detectives are supposed to be
assumed to be immune from danger and unchanging, as discussed in “The Typology
of Detective Fiction” by Tzvetan Todorov. It seems like this movie is more of
the thriller and suspense genre that was discussed in the essay because we didn’t
know what would happen to the detective and he wasn’t immune from death. I was
also quite surprised that they incorporated love and relationships into the
movie because detective stories usually have detectives that are not really
interested in love or are already settled down in that aspect, as discussed in “The
Typology of Detective Fiction” and in “The Guilty Vicarage.” This made it more
interesting since it made the viewers wonder if Spade’s feelings for the girl
would influence his decisions in the end, which did not happen after all.
I kind of wished that we could see more about how the
actual murders and crimes in the movie played out such as like eventually being
able to witness the murders, especially the shooting of the guy who eventually
gave the falcon to Spade. There was a lot of reference to these action scenes
but I wanted to actually see the action. Also, the majority of the movie was
spent figuring out what the falcon was and how people were getting paid to do
certain things, and the parts with evidence were very few. It was only in the
last few minutes that we actually find out who murdered the victims and how,
and this was simply through Spade’s mouth from some sort of train of thought
that the viewers are never actually hinted to. For example, how did he know
that the girl murdered Archer? It seemed like a lot of circumstantial evidence,
but I would have liked to have had some kind of evidence or thought process shown
to the viewers instead of being fed the fact at the end of the movie. The
discovery of the murderers was not very excited and that really made me less
interested in the movie. Also, it felt really inconclusive the way that we’re
never told about the actual whereabouts of the Maltese Falcon even though the
movie is named after it.
I agree with your ideas pertaining to how the mystery was presented throughout the movie as it does not give many details to keep the viewer enthralled. I think the studios were really not allowed to show excessive murders and gore as it is now in most action movies.
ReplyDeleteI had the same thought throughout the entire film that I wished we could see more of the action that drives the story instead of just having to hear about it from characters. I also agree that it was impossible to follow Spade's train of thought and therefore the final reveal seemed confusing to me. I think that his character could have benefitted from a sort of Watson-like character so he would have a reason to talk things through and have it make sense to the audience as well.
ReplyDeleteI understand what you mean about the lack of action in the movie. I did not think about it until I read your blog post, but you're right. The film is centered around the relationships between characters and the characters' deception and manipulation. I do not think the movie could have had as much action as you may have wanted to begin with, but I think the lack of action also puts more of the focus on the characters.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you!! This movie needs so much more action. You would think that the gory movies today would stem from these old mystery movies, but I was certainly proven wrong! And I also agree with Sophie, there was much focus on characterization throughout the movie. The audience really got to know the characters. It was really hard for me to understand Ms. O'Shaughnessy's character because she played so many different roles throughout the movie.
ReplyDelete