Valley of Fear Chapters 1 - 4

From the very start, The Valley of Fear establishes itself as a mystery novel. The way Sherlock Holmes, the central character, is introduced invokes a sense of mystery, as the narrator, later revealed to be Watson, presents him solving an actual mystery: "…he stared at the slip of paper which he had just drawn from its envelope. Then he took the envelope itself, held it up to the light, and very carefully studied both the exterior and the flap" (173). Doyle adds to the mystery by starting out with dialogue and not giving the readers any description of who the characters are. Of course, most people already know that Sherlock Holmes and John Watson are an iconic detective duo, just like Shaggy and Scooby Doo or Batman and Robin, but to a completely new reader this might add to the sense of mystery. Doyle’s introduction of Moriarty is even more mysterious. Moriarty is introduced first as Porlock. Then, Doyle throws out the next clue to Moriarty’s identity, which is that Porlock is just a fake name. Then, through Holmes, he finally reveals Moriarty’s name. Still, the reader has no clue who he is. After that, Doyle reveals more about the perception of who Moriarty is through Holmes’ paragraph-long rant. Still, Holmes uses several rhetorical questions and sounds sarcastic at times, so the reader is left unsure as to what’s true and what’s not, effectively leaving Moriarty a mystery. The way Doyle goes about describing Holmes’ deductions enhances the mystery, because he just gives obscure details one by one and never points out anything obvious. He takes the readers along for the journey with the characters themselves, as he describes the painstaking step-by-step process of how Holmes makes his deductions. In Chapter 3, Doyle employs a different method and instead unloads a large amount of expository information about who the victims were and what their lives were like. He has Watson set the stage by first establishing the setting, then the characters, then the dead man and subsequently the mystery.

By the end of Chapter 4, Doyle manages to paint a pretty clear picture of what the characters are like. Despite clearly being a great detective, Sherlock Holmes is kind of arrogant, and downright rude. His tone is kind of derisive and condescending towards Watson, although it is unclear if he means it that way. Watson uses words like “impatiently,” “sardonic,” and “deprecating” when describing Holmes’ manner of speech. Whenever Holmes explains things to Watson, he acts as if Watson should already know that. The first time that Holmes ever speaks in The Valley of Fear, it is an impatient interruption of Watson’s speech. It is kind of implied that Holmes just may not know that he’s being rude, since Doyle portrays him as one who is more wrapped up in his own head, as seen as when Watson says, “…he was too much absorbed with his own thoughts to give any immediate answer to my remonstrance,” and “he was speaking to himself rather than to me” (173). Despite his personality flaws, Sherlock Holmes is undeniably smart and willing to help for the sake of knowledge, as seen when Watson confirms that Holmes had helped MacDonald climb up the career ladder, with his “own sole reward being the intellectual joy of the problem” (180).


Watson, on the other hand, is the long-suffering partner. He is somewhat fed up with Holmes’ rudeness, but his eagerness to get to the bottom of the mysteries and slight admiration of Holmes drive him to put up with Holmes’ derision and arrogance (“…but my vexation disappeared in the interest which the words awakened” (173)). Watson also defers to Holmes at all times; he never deduces anything out loud without first asking Holmes what he makes of it. Doyle uses Watson as kind of the voice of the readers; Watson is the one who has to ask Holmes to explain, which is how the information is revealed to the readers. Watson is very much the Robin to Holmes’ Batman.

Comments

  1. I really enjoyed reading your extensive analysis on the relationship between Watson and Holmes. You definitely show the very complex feelings of vexation and admiration Watson feels about Holmes throughout your analysis. Watson sticks around with Holmes not just for the mysteries, but mainly because Watson is Sherlock's only true friend. He really is the only person who looks past the brain and sees the man that is Sherlock Holmes. It was briefly alluded to in the reading, but the greatest danger to Sherlock Holmes is nothing -- no cases, no adventure, just the intermission between cases. During these intermissions, Holmes uses a plethora of drugs such as tobacco, cocaine, and heroin to artificially stimulate his overactive mind, which numerous times has almost destroyed his health. Watson, doctor and friend that he is, is there for him to pick him up and ensure the legend doesn't collapse in on himself. Holmes needs cases (to survive), and since he never asks for credit when solving police cases, the only reason for his celebrity is Watson's published papers on Holmes. The vast majority of Holmes private clients go to Holmes after hearing about/reading his exploits from Watson, giving Holmes the cases he needs to continue. Overall, Watson serves as the concerned (and sometimes miffed) parent of the extremely precocious teen Sherlock.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, I did not know Sherlock Holmes was a drug addict as Varun noted!! Your analysis on Holmes' personality was very interesting to read because I hadn't given his feelings toward Watson much thought. I had just assumed this would be a super healthy and happy relationship since they are an iconic duo. It didn't occur to me that Holmes is slightly deprecating towards Watson. And your note of Holmes' first dialogue being an interruption in Watson's speech further proves he can be brusque at times. Like you said, it does make sense for him to not realize his rude manners as he is always wrapped up in his own thoughts. I certainly don't think he intends on being rude to his dear friend. Great analysis! It helped clarify the reading a little bit more for me, so thank you!

      Delete
  2. I agree that Watson acts as the voice of the readers, and I enjoyed reading what you said about our relationship with Holmes through Watson. When reading the first four chapters, I focused on Watson's personal relationship with Holmes and our relation to the narrator, but I agree with your point about Holmes' importance in our understanding of the story. In addition, I like how you compared Holmes and Watson to other iconic duos. Holmes and Watson are a famous pair, but the focus is typically left solely on Holmes. However, your emphasis on the duo shows that the pair needs one another because of the ways they think and act differently.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with the extensive characterization Doyle established by the end of the fourth chapter. Holmes is definitely a character with exceptional ability and good morals, all of which are established rather quickly in the work, but these traits are definitely juxtaposed by Doyle in the chapter, as you stated. I like your comparison between Watson and Robin, and it is definitely a point to agree on. It is as if Doyle made the reader feel bad for Watson as he follows Holmes through his wonderful journey. As far as Moriarty goes, I agree that Doyle kept both him and Porlock as the mysterious and rather underdeveloped characters when compared to Holmes and Watson. However, I don't seem to recall them being the same person, with Porlock being an alias for Moriarty. I thought they were different people with Porlock working with Moriarty and his projects. Overall though, i agree with your general statements about Holmes and Watson, and I definitely agree that Doyle crafted a mysterious work straight from the beginning of the novel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like how you focused on Doyle and took the time to analyze his thoughts and strategies as opposed to solely characterizing Holmes and Watson. I totally agree with your thoughts on Watson. As the narrator, he is definitely the voice of the reader; he takes what Holmes says and translates it into normal terms, making the story more relatable for the audience. I also felt that Watson gets fed up with Holmes and his attitude. Watson does put up with him though, because the two compliment each other. Holmes has the great thinking skills while Watson is able to balance him out and communicate with other people in the novel without being rude to them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts