Valley of Fear p. 207-281
I actually found this part of the book very exciting and
suspenseful. I originally thought that it would be a simple murder story, and I
loved the many plot twists that Doyle incorporated. At first, Doyle led us to
believe that Barker and Mrs. Douglas were cheating on Mr. Douglas and were the
culprits of the murder. However, it eventually turned out that they were
actually helping Mr. Douglas, who was still alive, which was something that I
was not expecting at all. Doyle continued to allow the readers feel the
suspense through the dialogue between Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in which
Holmes keeps asking Watson’s opinions, in which it seems like Watson is taking
the role of the audience in sharing his thoughts on Holmes’ theories. Furthermore,
Doyle tried to really make the reveal of the truth dramatic by having all of
the detectives wait outside for Barker to fish out the clothes, and the cold
weather really amplified this feeling of restlessness and suspense. I loved
that after Holmes spent the night in the study room, we were left wondering
what he figured out along with the other detectives. While the detectives were
mad that Holmes wasn’t sharing any information, it felt like we the audience
were in the same position as the detectives and were almost being teased by
Holmes’ hiding his information from us. This made it much more suspenseful and
made me curious.
However, though this part contained a lot of suspense, still
some of the deductions made seem to be sort of unreasonable and the detectives
seem to have great luck that somehow solves everything and almost seems like
Doyle is using dues ex machina technique to quickly solve the mystery. For
example, though Sherlock Holmes’ claims that having one dumbbell was very
strange and must be the solution to the entire mystery, I wondered if that was
really a reasonable thought. Yes, having a single dumbbell may be strange, but
how was he so sure that it had anything to do with the murder? Furthermore, it
seems unrealistic that Holmes just wanted to observe the study room just for
the sake of finding the dumbbell—which again, I believe is a far-fetched
assumption. And strangely, he actually did find it and solved the entire
mystery. He claimed that having a dumbbell missing and water nearby meant that
something was being weighed down—I surely felt like that was far-fetched. Also,
they were quite lucky that the person to went to kill Mr. Douglas somehow had
the same height and figure as him.
Though the second part of the reading was slower and less
suspenseful, it was interesting to see how things played out. I wasn’t really
quite sure how the second part tied in with the first, but the character
presented in the second part seems to be the past of Mr. Douglas. Though I’m
not sure why he has a different last name in the past, everything from the past
in Chicago, the joining of a secret society, his encounter with Ettie (who
might be the first wife?), and his quarrels with Mr. Balwin (who might be the
person who wants to kill him) seems to point to the past of Mr. Douglas that
was constantly hinted at in the first part. It seems like Mr. Douglas had a very
successful past as a part of the secret society, and I wonder what happened so
that he had to live his life hiding (if it is actually Mr. Douglas).
I agree with you that a lot of key plot points are very unrealistic. The chances of the killer being very similar to Mr. Douglas are very low. Also, Sherlock using a missing dumbbell to solve a complex murder is a bit far-fetched. Doyle is likely using this to accelerate the plot to a more exciting conclusion.
ReplyDeleteI like how you critiqued Doyle's choice of the dumbbell as a key point in solving the mystery. Even though Sherlock provides his reasoning as to why he believes the dumbbell is a sign that Mr. Douglas is not the victim of a murder, he does not use deductive reasoning to reach this conclusion. Doyle breaks with his pattern of Sherlock's systematic explanations, which make the reader feel a bit confused as to how Sherlock could quickly determine the dumbbell's purpose. I also agree with you that the second part of the novel is less exciting, rather it is just providing background information. What makes you think that Mr. Douglas was a successful member of the secret society? I was a bit confused if Mr. Douglas was a member of the Scowrers, or if he is just being sought after by them as their enemy.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your statement about the deductions. The dumbbell thing seemed kind of far-fetched. I personally only use one dumbbell because I'm a mess and lost the other one, so I don't think Holmes could have assumed that there was definitely a second dumbbell and that it was apart of the mystery.
ReplyDelete