Book of Jonah/Prophecy Essay
I enjoyed the Book of Jonah way more than other books from the Bible that I have read over the past few years. I honestly think that the only reason this is true is just because of the absurdity when Jonah gets eaten by the whale. To me, this seemed like such a funny contrast in comparison with how seriously so many people take Bible readings and how these often stories act as the basis for how people live their entire lives. While I know that some people believe every word of the Bible is historically true and accurate meanwhile others don't see how these stories could have possibly taken place, I have never really considered this question until Jonah was swallowed by a fish and then vomited back up to carry on his life.
Because I considered the difficult question of reality while reading the Book of Jonah, the question from the Prophecy writing that stood out the most to me was when he asked, "Are we sure that the terms "parabolic" and "historical" need be understood as restrictively as we have traditionally conceived them?" While the modern version of the story appreciates the unrealistic aspects more, the older version pays more attention to the historical aspects. The writing then goes on to explain how our understanding of the Bible is hindered by our tendency to focus on only one of these approaches instead of both, and that it would be to our best benefit in understanding the stories on a deeper level if we allowed "history and parable to mingle". Given that my immediate reaction of Jonah getting eaten by a fish then vomited back up was immediately just thinking to myself "that's ridiculous and so unrealistic," I should have considered this mingling effect and thought about the importance/relevance of this moment in the parable to contribute to my understanding of the entire story instead of simply focusing on the practicality.
Because I considered the difficult question of reality while reading the Book of Jonah, the question from the Prophecy writing that stood out the most to me was when he asked, "Are we sure that the terms "parabolic" and "historical" need be understood as restrictively as we have traditionally conceived them?" While the modern version of the story appreciates the unrealistic aspects more, the older version pays more attention to the historical aspects. The writing then goes on to explain how our understanding of the Bible is hindered by our tendency to focus on only one of these approaches instead of both, and that it would be to our best benefit in understanding the stories on a deeper level if we allowed "history and parable to mingle". Given that my immediate reaction of Jonah getting eaten by a fish then vomited back up was immediately just thinking to myself "that's ridiculous and so unrealistic," I should have considered this mingling effect and thought about the importance/relevance of this moment in the parable to contribute to my understanding of the entire story instead of simply focusing on the practicality.
I agree with you! It was really unexpected, but also funny when Jonah was eaten by the whale. People are very serious about the Bible so it was really interesting to see how absurd it was. I also agree with your observation about "parabolic" and "historical." I think it may be due to the fact that in the past, religion was taken a lot more seriously and so history and parable kind of blended together.
ReplyDelete